Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:59

Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
NVIDIA also planning GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER with 24GB GDDR7 memory - VideoCardz.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Who would win, an F-22 Raptor or Tie Defender?
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
‘The Life of Chuck’: Never Mind the Apocalypse, Watch Tom Hiddleston Dance! - Rolling Stone
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ilia Topuria KOs Charles Oliveira in 1st Round at UFC 317 to Win Lightweight Title - Bleacher Report
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Can humans drink battery water?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Julia DeVillers On Sign of Anal Cancer She Mistook For Menopause - TODAY.com